Alternative statutory remedy under GST bars writ challenge where classification, notice variance, and hearing disputes require factual appellate revie...
Duplicate PAN cancellation timeframe requires prior administrative representation before judicial intervention, ensuring a time-bound decision on the ...
Whether in exercise of powers under the proviso to Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, this court should transfer the present proceedings to NCLT? - normally, this court would transfer the matter to NCLT. This would also give an opportunity to try and revive the company by the Insolvency Resolution Process. There may be exceptional circumstances where the Liquidator has made much progress and the chances of Insolvency Resolution Process are very bleak then, in that eventuality this court may exercise its discretion and not transfer such a matter.
Whether in exercise of powers under the proviso to Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, this court should transfer the present proceedings to NCLT? - normally, this court would transfer the matter to NCLT. This would also give an opportunity to try and revive the company by the Insolvency Resolution Process. There may be exceptional circumstances where the Liquidator has made much progress and the chances of Insolvency Resolution Process are very bleak then, in that eventuality this court may exercise its discretion and not transfer such a matter.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
