Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Late filing fee u/s 234E - The late fee has been charged by the AO while processing the TDS statement u/s 200A on 14.06.2013, which is indeed prior to 01.06.2015 - a perusal of bare provisions of Section 200A show that prior to 01.06.2015, it did not empower the AO to levy the fee u/s 234E while processing the statement of TDS - levy not chargeable at the relevant point of time
Late filing fee u/s 234E - The late fee has been charged by the AO while processing the TDS statement u/s 200A on 14.06.2013, which is indeed prior to 01.06.2015 - a perusal of bare provisions of Section 200A show that prior to 01.06.2015, it did not empower the AO to levy the fee u/s 234E while processing the statement of TDS - levy not chargeable at the relevant point of time
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.