Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Revision u/s 263 - limitation provide for passing of order - the delay involved in service was more than 9 months which is unreasonable and the department could not explain the reasons for such long delay in serving the order to the assessee as well as the AO - the order was passed beyond the time limit allowed under the Act, hence, the order passed u/s 263 was unsustainable and quashed
Revision u/s 263 - limitation provide for passing of order - the delay involved in service was more than 9 months which is unreasonable and the department could not explain the reasons for such long delay in serving the order to the assessee as well as the AO - the order was passed beyond the time limit allowed under the Act, hence, the order passed u/s 263 was unsustainable and quashed
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.