Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - limitation - service to CIT (Judicial) - the mandatory period of limitation u/s 275(1)(a) cannot be sought to be defeated by delaying the dispatch of the relevant order of the ITAT to the concerned ‘jurisdictional’ CIT - what is relevant is when the CIT(Judicial) representing the Department before the ITAT received the order - the impugned penalty orders are clearly without jurisdiction
Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - limitation - service to CIT (Judicial) - the mandatory period of limitation u/s 275(1)(a) cannot be sought to be defeated by delaying the dispatch of the relevant order of the ITAT to the concerned ‘jurisdictional’ CIT - what is relevant is when the CIT(Judicial) representing the Department before the ITAT received the order - the impugned penalty orders are clearly without jurisdiction
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
