Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Page of 4921
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 98411 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 69A - unexplained money - the evidence placed before the AO clearly indicated that Mr. Chaturvedi confirmed that the draft was given by him to the Assessee and the Assessee had not benefited in any way from any of the above transactions - the CIT (A) and the ITAT was right that the addition to the income of the Assessee was not warranted
Addition u/s 69A - unexplained money - the evidence placed before the AO clearly indicated that Mr. Chaturvedi confirmed that the draft was given by him to the Assessee and the Assessee had not benefited in any way from any of the above transactions - the CIT (A) and the ITAT was right that the addition to the income of the Assessee was not warranted
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.