Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
Disallowance of Employees’ Contribution to PF - inadvertently disallowed in the revised return despite remitted within the due dates - DRP brushed aside the assessee’s claim holding that in view of section 144C(1) the claim does not relate to any variation made by the AO - whatever may be the fetters placed on the scope of the powers of the DRP, there can be no estoppel against the application/operation of law laid by the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court - allowable
Disallowance of Employees’ Contribution to PF - inadvertently disallowed in the revised return despite remitted within the due dates - DRP brushed aside the assessee’s claim holding that in view of section 144C(1) the claim does not relate to any variation made by the AO - whatever may be the fetters placed on the scope of the powers of the DRP, there can be no estoppel against the application/operation of law laid by the Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court - allowable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4894 
