Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Juridical seat versus arbitral venue determines supervisory court jurisdiction, while timely award challenges remain within the prescribed limitation ...
Clandestine removal - TMT Bars - statements accepting that goods are dislodged from the factory without following procedure was duly recorded u/s 14 of the CE Act, was ignored or not taken into consideration by the appellate Tribunal - it is a case of acceptance and failure to explain the huge variation in the stock and the variations were not having been disputed, the demand so made and calculated by the AO was in conformity with the law
Clandestine removal - TMT Bars - statements accepting that goods are dislodged from the factory without following procedure was duly recorded u/s 14 of the CE Act, was ignored or not taken into consideration by the appellate Tribunal - it is a case of acceptance and failure to explain the huge variation in the stock and the variations were not having been disputed, the demand so made and calculated by the AO was in conformity with the law
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.