Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Clandestine removal - TMT Bars - statements accepting that goods are dislodged from the factory without following procedure was duly recorded u/s 14 of the CE Act, was ignored or not taken into consideration by the appellate Tribunal - it is a case of acceptance and failure to explain the huge variation in the stock and the variations were not having been disputed, the demand so made and calculated by the AO was in conformity with the law
Clandestine removal - TMT Bars - statements accepting that goods are dislodged from the factory without following procedure was duly recorded u/s 14 of the CE Act, was ignored or not taken into consideration by the appellate Tribunal - it is a case of acceptance and failure to explain the huge variation in the stock and the variations were not having been disputed, the demand so made and calculated by the AO was in conformity with the law
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.