Appellate jurisdiction over baggage imports is excluded, requiring confiscation challenges involving passenger-carried gold to proceed by statutory re...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund claim - mere admission of an appeal would not by itself lead to the stay of the order being appealed against before this Court, it only indicates that the issue raised in the appeal requires consideration and does not denying the benefits available to the respondents by virtue of the impugned order of the Tribunal - no stay for refund
Refund claim - mere admission of an appeal would not by itself lead to the stay of the order being appealed against before this Court, it only indicates that the issue raised in the appeal requires consideration and does not denying the benefits available to the respondents by virtue of the impugned order of the Tribunal - no stay for refund
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.