Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Return filed was non-est return and not a valid return in the eyes of law as per Section 139(4)- Clause (a) of Explanation 2 would squarely apply which provide that income would be deemed to have escaped assessment in case no return was furnished although assessee income exceeded the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income tax - reassessment valid
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Return filed was non-est return and not a valid return in the eyes of law as per Section 139(4)- Clause (a) of Explanation 2 would squarely apply which provide that income would be deemed to have escaped assessment in case no return was furnished although assessee income exceeded the maximum amount which is not chargeable to income tax - reassessment valid
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.