Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Interest on refund - the wording of Section 42(1) of DVAT Act is unambiguous which talks of the two dates i.e. date the refund was due to be paid to the person and “until the date‟ on which the refund is “given‟ - The word “given‟ should mean, the date on which the refund amount is actually received by the Petitioner and not the date on which the refund order is issued - directed to pay interest
Interest on refund - the wording of Section 42(1) of DVAT Act is unambiguous which talks of the two dates i.e. date the refund was due to be paid to the person and “until the date‟ on which the refund is “given‟ - The word “given‟ should mean, the date on which the refund amount is actually received by the Petitioner and not the date on which the refund order is issued - directed to pay interest
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.