Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
241 to 260 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Interest on refund - the wording of Section 42(1) of DVAT Act is unambiguous which talks of the two dates i.e. date the refund was due to be paid to the person and “until the date‟ on which the refund is “given‟ - The word “given‟ should mean, the date on which the refund amount is actually received by the Petitioner and not the date on which the refund order is issued - directed to pay interest
Interest on refund - the wording of Section 42(1) of DVAT Act is unambiguous which talks of the two dates i.e. date the refund was due to be paid to the person and “until the date‟ on which the refund is “given‟ - The word “given‟ should mean, the date on which the refund amount is actually received by the Petitioner and not the date on which the refund order is issued - directed to pay interest
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
