Contingency expenses, exempt-income disallowance, and royalty benchmarking: unsupported adjustments were deleted under consistent accounting and trans...
Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
Rectification u/s 154 by CIT(A) - date of applicability of provision of Section 56(2)(viib) - we are not interpreting the provision as such as to the date of applicability but only examining the issue as to whether the issue is debatable - since it is debatable issue in view of the contrary view taken by the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court - not a mistake apparent on record - CIT(A) wrongly rectified the order.
Rectification u/s 154 by CIT(A) - date of applicability of provision of Section 56(2)(viib) - we are not interpreting the provision as such as to the date of applicability but only examining the issue as to whether the issue is debatable - since it is debatable issue in view of the contrary view taken by the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court - not a mistake apparent on record - CIT(A) wrongly rectified the order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.