COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
681 to 700 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Revision u/s 264 - payment of tax on FTS under the DTAA at wrong rate (20% instead 10%) - it is not even denied by the Department that the Petitioner committed a mistake and should have paid tax at 10% - extra 10% paid by the Petitioner was of its own volition, it was indeed prejudicial to the Assessee - all the ingredients of Section 264 stand attracted hence permissible
Revision u/s 264 - payment of tax on FTS under the DTAA at wrong rate (20% instead 10%) - it is not even denied by the Department that the Petitioner committed a mistake and should have paid tax at 10% - extra 10% paid by the Petitioner was of its own volition, it was indeed prejudicial to the Assessee - all the ingredients of Section 264 stand attracted hence permissible
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4891 
