Human-probability test defeats political donation deduction where banking records mask accommodation-entry fund layering and evidence shows non-genuin...
Commercial property status protects capital-gains exemption when residential-house ownership limits are tested, while agricultural-land character gove...
Investigation deposits refunded after failed customs demands fall outside the statutory appellate pre-deposit interest regime and may attract compensa...
Resolution plan finality extinguishes unquantified operational-creditor claims and pending proceedings unless the approved plan expressly preserves th...
Revision u/s 264 - payment of tax on FTS under the DTAA at wrong rate (20% instead 10%) - it is not even denied by the Department that the Petitioner committed a mistake and should have paid tax at 10% - extra 10% paid by the Petitioner was of its own volition, it was indeed prejudicial to the Assessee - all the ingredients of Section 264 stand attracted hence permissible
Revision u/s 264 - payment of tax on FTS under the DTAA at wrong rate (20% instead 10%) - it is not even denied by the Department that the Petitioner committed a mistake and should have paid tax at 10% - extra 10% paid by the Petitioner was of its own volition, it was indeed prejudicial to the Assessee - all the ingredients of Section 264 stand attracted hence permissible
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
