Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Revision u/s 263 - AO made no enquiry for details of deposits neither anyalysed identity, genuineness and creditworthiness nor examined eligibility for deduction u/s. 80P(2) - neither audited account by an accountant or under co-operative audit was filed, even TAR u/s 44AB not filed - without making any enquiry into these issues, the AO accepted the assessee’s claim - the assessment order is erroneous which also resulted in loss to the revenue - revision valid
Revision u/s 263 - AO made no enquiry for details of deposits neither anyalysed identity, genuineness and creditworthiness nor examined eligibility for deduction u/s. 80P(2) - neither audited account by an accountant or under co-operative audit was filed, even TAR u/s 44AB not filed - without making any enquiry into these issues, the AO accepted the assessee’s claim - the assessment order is erroneous which also resulted in loss to the revenue - revision valid
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.