Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Rectification u/s 254(2) - failure to take cognizance of certain judicial pronouncements - non-consideration of the judgments of the jurisdictional High Court and the Tribunal, which were specifically relied upon by the counsel during the course of the hearing of the appeal constitutes a mistake apparent from record - rectification allowable
Rectification u/s 254(2) - failure to take cognizance of certain judicial pronouncements - non-consideration of the judgments of the jurisdictional High Court and the Tribunal, which were specifically relied upon by the counsel during the course of the hearing of the appeal constitutes a mistake apparent from record - rectification allowable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
