Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Page of 4786
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95715 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
100% EOU - Clandestine removal - it is not the responsibility of the appellant to get the physical verification conducted - The failure to check physical receipt of goods cannot be used against the appellant who has received duly signed re-warehousing certificates.
100% EOU - Clandestine removal - it is not the responsibility of the appellant to get the physical verification conducted - The failure to check physical receipt of goods cannot be used against the appellant who has received duly signed re-warehousing certificates.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.