Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Taxability of subsidy received under TUF scheme - revenue or capital receipts or reduction in value of fixed assets - to reduce from the cost of asset, the subsidy should be directly or indirectly used for acquiring an asset - In present case no asset was being acquired by using TUF subsidy therefore it should not be reduced from fixed assets - hence, such TUF subsidy is to be treated capital receipt
Taxability of subsidy received under TUF scheme - revenue or capital receipts or reduction in value of fixed assets - to reduce from the cost of asset, the subsidy should be directly or indirectly used for acquiring an asset - In present case no asset was being acquired by using TUF subsidy therefore it should not be reduced from fixed assets - hence, such TUF subsidy is to be treated capital receipt
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
