Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of SAD - N/N. 102/2007 - entity who had paid VAT were different from the importer - certificate issued by the VAT clearly certifies that Mr. Ahmed Hajee Mohiudeen is the proprietor of M/s. Mohiudeen Saw Mills and M/s. Hajee Timber Complex and they have been registered dealer under the Karnataka VAT - the objection of the Department that these two concerns are separate entities is not justified - refund allowable
Refund of SAD - N/N. 102/2007 - entity who had paid VAT were different from the importer - certificate issued by the VAT clearly certifies that Mr. Ahmed Hajee Mohiudeen is the proprietor of M/s. Mohiudeen Saw Mills and M/s. Hajee Timber Complex and they have been registered dealer under the Karnataka VAT - the objection of the Department that these two concerns are separate entities is not justified - refund allowable
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
