Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Rectification u/s 254 - the assessee would be entitled to claim deduction u/s. 10A for the unexpired period even if it relates to IQF with regard to processing of prawns, provided the assessee had made claim u/s 10A and the A.O. had granted deduction for the assessment year’s prior to amendment - Tribunal decision to disallow the deduction is a error apparent on record in view of decision of Jurisdiction High Court
Rectification u/s 254 - the assessee would be entitled to claim deduction u/s. 10A for the unexpired period even if it relates to IQF with regard to processing of prawns, provided the assessee had made claim u/s 10A and the A.O. had granted deduction for the assessment year’s prior to amendment - Tribunal decision to disallow the deduction is a error apparent on record in view of decision of Jurisdiction High Court
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.