Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Reassessment u/s 147 - validity of notice - reasons for reopening the assessment have been recorded by the jurisdictional AO viz. the Dy. CIT, Circle 2, Jamnagar but the impugned notice u/s 148(1) has been issued by the ITO, Ward 2(2), Jamnagar who had no jurisdiction over the petitioner, and hence, such notice was bad on the account of having been issued by an officer who had not authority in law to issue such notice - notice and reassessment quashed
Reassessment u/s 147 - validity of notice - reasons for reopening the assessment have been recorded by the jurisdictional AO viz. the Dy. CIT, Circle 2, Jamnagar but the impugned notice u/s 148(1) has been issued by the ITO, Ward 2(2), Jamnagar who had no jurisdiction over the petitioner, and hence, such notice was bad on the account of having been issued by an officer who had not authority in law to issue such notice - notice and reassessment quashed
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.