Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Seizure of cash in election by ECI - IT Dept. has completely failed to appreciate that neither the seizure was u/s 132 nor the pre-requisite to an exercise of search and seizure u/s 132 were satisfied nor the requisition satisfies the provisions of Section 226(3), which is the only provision enabling the IT Dept. to take over the money apart from the search and seizure - directed to refund with interest @ 10%
Seizure of cash in election by ECI - IT Dept. has completely failed to appreciate that neither the seizure was u/s 132 nor the pre-requisite to an exercise of search and seizure u/s 132 were satisfied nor the requisition satisfies the provisions of Section 226(3), which is the only provision enabling the IT Dept. to take over the money apart from the search and seizure - directed to refund with interest @ 10%
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4785
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
