COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Section 153C jurisdiction requires timely deemed search and assessee-specific satisfaction material; otherwise reassessment must use the proper statut...
Page of 4891
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
681 to 700 of 97820 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Mandatory procedure u/s 260A - scope and procedure to adopted by the HC u/s 260A - The appeal is heard on merits only on the questions framed by the High Court u/s 260A(3) provided u/s 260A(4) - If the High Court was of the view that the appeal did not involve any substantial question of law, it should have recorded a categorical finding and should have dismissed the appeal in limine.
Mandatory procedure u/s 260A - scope and procedure to adopted by the HC u/s 260A - The appeal is heard on merits only on the questions framed by the High Court u/s 260A(3) provided u/s 260A(4) - If the High Court was of the view that the appeal did not involve any substantial question of law, it should have recorded a categorical finding and should have dismissed the appeal in limine.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.