Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Justification for the expenditure - amount paid towards secondment of employees - The contention of the AO that, real beneficiary of the Australian entity’s employees was not the JV but the AE, rejected. - Revenue is not permitted to hold salary payment reimbursed to AE is a non deductible expenditure.
Justification for the expenditure - amount paid towards secondment of employees - The contention of the AO that, real beneficiary of the Australian entity’s employees was not the JV but the AE, rejected. - Revenue is not permitted to hold salary payment reimbursed to AE is a non deductible expenditure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.