Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Detention of goods - mistake had crept in, in the mentioning of the lorry number as TN 19 U 7857 instead of TN 19 U 7873 - It is incumbent upon the statutory authority/the Proper Officer to have made mention of the contravention in the field provided in the impugned order for such purpose. This has not been done - The present order of detention cannot be sustained and the same is quashed.
Detention of goods - mistake had crept in, in the mentioning of the lorry number as TN 19 U 7857 instead of TN 19 U 7873 - It is incumbent upon the statutory authority/the Proper Officer to have made mention of the contravention in the field provided in the impugned order for such purpose. This has not been done - The present order of detention cannot be sustained and the same is quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.