Embezzlement losses in charitable institutions remain allowable when misappropriation is established, irrecoverable, and not a specified-person benefi...
National long-distance undertaking status supports deduction where separately licensed infrastructure, resources, revenue, and expenditure establish c...
Agency reimbursement income follows contractual deposit-liability computation, while pending deposit collections do not constitute deemed-dividend loa...
Membership-consent thresholds for oppression petitions are satisfied by unchallenged voter-list consents, while unsupported forgery claims require pro...
Eligibility to deduction u/s 80IA - allocation of expenditure - In absence of any material that the methodology for allocation of expenditure followed by the CIT (A) and confirmed by the Tribunal was incorrect or perverse, High Court find no reason to interfere with the factual findings of the Tribunal.
Eligibility to deduction u/s 80IA - allocation of expenditure - In absence of any material that the methodology for allocation of expenditure followed by the CIT (A) and confirmed by the Tribunal was incorrect or perverse, High Court find no reason to interfere with the factual findings of the Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.