Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Eligibility to deduction u/s 80IA - allocation of expenditure - In absence of any material that the methodology for allocation of expenditure followed by the CIT (A) and confirmed by the Tribunal was incorrect or perverse, High Court find no reason to interfere with the factual findings of the Tribunal.
Eligibility to deduction u/s 80IA - allocation of expenditure - In absence of any material that the methodology for allocation of expenditure followed by the CIT (A) and confirmed by the Tribunal was incorrect or perverse, High Court find no reason to interfere with the factual findings of the Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.