Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of service tax paid erroneously - no service was provided - the refund claim which has been filed within one year after receiving the order or after coming to know about the amalgamation has to be considered to be made within the time prescribed u/s 11B - refund claim cannot be rejected on the ground of period of limitation.
Refund of service tax paid erroneously - no service was provided - the refund claim which has been filed within one year after receiving the order or after coming to know about the amalgamation has to be considered to be made within the time prescribed u/s 11B - refund claim cannot be rejected on the ground of period of limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.