Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Refund of service tax paid erroneously - no service was provided - the refund claim which has been filed within one year after receiving the order or after coming to know about the amalgamation has to be considered to be made within the time prescribed u/s 11B - refund claim cannot be rejected on the ground of period of limitation.
Refund of service tax paid erroneously - no service was provided - the refund claim which has been filed within one year after receiving the order or after coming to know about the amalgamation has to be considered to be made within the time prescribed u/s 11B - refund claim cannot be rejected on the ground of period of limitation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4792
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
