Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Appellant has claimed the deduction of the amount claimed as refund by them as expense in his profit and loss account, i.e. as a deduction u/s 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - The only possible way to pass the bar of Unjust Enrichment is that the disputed tax /duty is not expenses off in the accounts, but booked as ‘Receivables’ - refund not allowed.
Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Appellant has claimed the deduction of the amount claimed as refund by them as expense in his profit and loss account, i.e. as a deduction u/s 43B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 - The only possible way to pass the bar of Unjust Enrichment is that the disputed tax /duty is not expenses off in the accounts, but booked as ‘Receivables’ - refund not allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.