Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Transfer-pricing comparability filters require fresh arm's-length analysis, while delayed receivables need separate reconsideration with working-capit...
Page of 4894
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 97867 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Recovery proceedings - attachment of property - order u/s 281 of the Income Tax Act - under the amended provision, the question of mens rea or intention to defraud does not arise - it is up to the assessee under the amended provision, to go to the Civil Court and establish that his case falls under the proviso to section 281(1)
Recovery proceedings - attachment of property - order u/s 281 of the Income Tax Act - under the amended provision, the question of mens rea or intention to defraud does not arise - it is up to the assessee under the amended provision, to go to the Civil Court and establish that his case falls under the proviso to section 281(1)
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.