Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Recovery proceedings - attachment of property - order u/s 281 of the Income Tax Act - under the amended provision, the question of mens rea or intention to defraud does not arise - it is up to the assessee under the amended provision, to go to the Civil Court and establish that his case falls under the proviso to section 281(1)
Recovery proceedings - attachment of property - order u/s 281 of the Income Tax Act - under the amended provision, the question of mens rea or intention to defraud does not arise - it is up to the assessee under the amended provision, to go to the Civil Court and establish that his case falls under the proviso to section 281(1)
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.