Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Reopening of assessment - Jurisdiction of AO - AO, Mumbai who has issued the notice u/s 148 was not having jurisdiction as only AO, Dehradun was having the jurisdiction as per Notification, even the notice issued by AO, Mumbai was never served upon the assessee - entire reopening proceedings and consequent reassessment is void ab initio - AT
Reopening of assessment - Jurisdiction of AO - AO, Mumbai who has issued the notice u/s 148 was not having jurisdiction as only AO, Dehradun was having the jurisdiction as per Notification, even the notice issued by AO, Mumbai was never served upon the assessee - entire reopening proceedings and consequent reassessment is void ab initio - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.