Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Addition made u/s 40A(3) - payment through bearer cheques - payment made otherwise than by cheque or crossed cheque - since the entries in the bank statement reflects the names of two parties and also because of compelling circumstances of the sellers asking for such payment, then we hold that there is no merit in invoking provisions of section 40A(3) to such transactions - AT
Addition made u/s 40A(3) - payment through bearer cheques - payment made otherwise than by cheque or crossed cheque - since the entries in the bank statement reflects the names of two parties and also because of compelling circumstances of the sellers asking for such payment, then we hold that there is no merit in invoking provisions of section 40A(3) to such transactions - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.