Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Addition made u/s 40A(3) - payment through bearer cheques - payment made otherwise than by cheque or crossed cheque - since the entries in the bank statement reflects the names of two parties and also because of compelling circumstances of the sellers asking for such payment, then we hold that there is no merit in invoking provisions of section 40A(3) to such transactions - AT
Addition made u/s 40A(3) - payment through bearer cheques - payment made otherwise than by cheque or crossed cheque - since the entries in the bank statement reflects the names of two parties and also because of compelling circumstances of the sellers asking for such payment, then we hold that there is no merit in invoking provisions of section 40A(3) to such transactions - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.