Credit-note turnover adjustments preserve inverted-duty refunds, while ministerial re-computation does not constitute an impermissible appellate reman...
Revisional jurisdiction over export quota premium deductions requires both error and Revenue prejudice; a permissible assessment view cannot be displa...
Final benami adjudication bars contradictory tax-evasion prosecution where settlement findings confirm full disclosure and cooperation without conceal...
Refund of service tax claimed by the recipient of services (buyer of flat instead of builder) - Composite contract in relation to construction of complex - Claiming of the benefit of the judgment, in the caes of Suresh Kumar Bansal [2016 (6) TMI 192 - DELHI HIGH COURT], cannot be denied to the appellant as the same was rendered “in rem” and not “in personem”. - AT
Refund of service tax claimed by the recipient of services (buyer of flat instead of builder) - Composite contract in relation to construction of complex - Claiming of the benefit of the judgment, in the caes of Suresh Kumar Bansal [2016 (6) TMI 192 - DELHI HIGH COURT], cannot be denied to the appellant as the same was rendered “in rem” and not “in personem”. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.