Coercive recovery during GST searches is restrained pending scrutiny, preserving normal business operations and requiring adherence to investigation g...
COVID-19 limitation exclusion and destination-specific e-way bills govern revisional timelines and penalties for undocumented third-party plywood deli...
Questions arising from miscellaneous application orders cannot challenge unaltered Tribunal findings, leaving the original order separately challengea...
Page of 4888
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 97750 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Refund of service tax claimed by the recipient of services (buyer of flat instead of builder) - Composite contract in relation to construction of complex - Claiming of the benefit of the judgment, in the caes of Suresh Kumar Bansal [2016 (6) TMI 192 - DELHI HIGH COURT], cannot be denied to the appellant as the same was rendered “in rem” and not “in personem”. - AT
Refund of service tax claimed by the recipient of services (buyer of flat instead of builder) - Composite contract in relation to construction of complex - Claiming of the benefit of the judgment, in the caes of Suresh Kumar Bansal [2016 (6) TMI 192 - DELHI HIGH COURT], cannot be denied to the appellant as the same was rendered “in rem” and not “in personem”. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.