Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Penalty u/s 114(A) - appellants have wrongly claimed the exemption as the goods imported was not meant for manufacture of optical fiber cable - It cannot be said that the appellants had any mala fide intention of fraudulently claiming the benefit of exemption notification - No penalty - AT
Penalty u/s 114(A) - appellants have wrongly claimed the exemption as the goods imported was not meant for manufacture of optical fiber cable - It cannot be said that the appellants had any mala fide intention of fraudulently claiming the benefit of exemption notification - No penalty - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
