Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
TDS u/s 194C OR 194J - payee recipient had to merely issue its intellectual/technical skills without any physical work through employee or deploy assets - its recipient’s information technology related integrated service activities amount to technical services only. The assessee’s reliance on its itemized billings of the above services in classifying the same as bundled payments/services cannot be accepted - AT
TDS u/s 194C OR 194J - payee recipient had to merely issue its intellectual/technical skills without any physical work through employee or deploy assets - its recipient’s information technology related integrated service activities amount to technical services only. The assessee’s reliance on its itemized billings of the above services in classifying the same as bundled payments/services cannot be accepted - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.