Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Recovery of excess duty - Section 11D(2) of the CEA, 1944 - the appellant had cleared the inputs as such on payment of duty, adopting transaction value, instead of reversing the credit - recovery could be effected for three years from the date of issue of show cause notice. - AT
Recovery of excess duty - Section 11D(2) of the CEA, 1944 - the appellant had cleared the inputs as such on payment of duty, adopting transaction value, instead of reversing the credit - recovery could be effected for three years from the date of issue of show cause notice. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
