Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Addition u/s 69C - the assessee had discharged the initial burden. It was duty of the AO to rebut the evidences produced by the assessee. But, he did not bring anything on record. - the FAA had rightly held that the provisions of section 69C cannot be invoked for bogus purchases - AT
Addition u/s 69C - the assessee had discharged the initial burden. It was duty of the AO to rebut the evidences produced by the assessee. But, he did not bring anything on record. - the FAA had rightly held that the provisions of section 69C cannot be invoked for bogus purchases - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
