Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Addition u/s 69C - the assessee had discharged the initial burden. It was duty of the AO to rebut the evidences produced by the assessee. But, he did not bring anything on record. - the FAA had rightly held that the provisions of section 69C cannot be invoked for bogus purchases - AT
Addition u/s 69C - the assessee had discharged the initial burden. It was duty of the AO to rebut the evidences produced by the assessee. But, he did not bring anything on record. - the FAA had rightly held that the provisions of section 69C cannot be invoked for bogus purchases - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.