Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Extended period was invoked, not for recovery of non-levied tax but, merely to impose penalties under section 76 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994. The finding of the first appellate authority that demand is barred by limitation is, therefore, legal and proper. - AT
Extended period was invoked, not for recovery of non-levied tax but, merely to impose penalties under section 76 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994. The finding of the first appellate authority that demand is barred by limitation is, therefore, legal and proper. - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.