Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The assessee invested its funds in the equity shares of a company incorporated outside India. The third proviso to Section 10(23C) clearly says that the assessee cannot invest in the equity shares of any company and the investment has to be made only as per the mode prescribed under Section 11(5) - Approval u/s 10(23C)(vi) not granted - AT
The assessee invested its funds in the equity shares of a company incorporated outside India. The third proviso to Section 10(23C) clearly says that the assessee cannot invest in the equity shares of any company and the investment has to be made only as per the mode prescribed under Section 11(5) - Approval u/s 10(23C)(vi) not granted - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.