Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Refund of SAD - SAD had been paid, not in cash, but by utilising the DEPB scrip - scope of circular - Circular issued by the CBEC could not have imposed an additional restriction for availing of the exemption in terms of the Notification No. 102/2007-Cus issued under Section 25(1) of the Act. - HC
Refund of SAD - SAD had been paid, not in cash, but by utilising the DEPB scrip - scope of circular - Circular issued by the CBEC could not have imposed an additional restriction for availing of the exemption in terms of the Notification No. 102/2007-Cus issued under Section 25(1) of the Act. - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.