Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Validity of order passed u/s. 143(3) read with section 144C(13) - the final order should have been passed on or before 30.11.2014, but the same has been passed on 30.01.2015, which is clearly beyond the period of limitation as prescribed u/s. 144C - the order is s bad in law ab initio - AT
Validity of order passed u/s. 143(3) read with section 144C(13) - the final order should have been passed on or before 30.11.2014, but the same has been passed on 30.01.2015, which is clearly beyond the period of limitation as prescribed u/s. 144C - the order is s bad in law ab initio - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.