Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Refund claim – Appellant contends that payment of service tax was a mistake; the period of limitation would not apply – Authorities working under Central Excise law are bound by provision of limitation prescribed in terms of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act - AT
Refund claim – Appellant contends that payment of service tax was a mistake; the period of limitation would not apply – Authorities working under Central Excise law are bound by provision of limitation prescribed in terms of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
