Infrastructure-development deduction remains available to EPC contractors when substantive statutory conditions outweigh contractor labels in agreemen...
Explained Investment Sources: documented gifts and traceable salary savings supported deletion of additions for property and mutual-fund SIP investmen...
Internal comparable pricing supports arm's-length interest on compulsorily convertible debentures, preventing their recharacterisation as equity for t...
Nominee director protection shields independent financial-institution appointees from criminal liability where they lack involvement in deposit defaul...
Refund claim – Appellant contends that payment of service tax was a mistake; the period of limitation would not apply – Authorities working under Central Excise law are bound by provision of limitation prescribed in terms of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act - AT
Refund claim – Appellant contends that payment of service tax was a mistake; the period of limitation would not apply – Authorities working under Central Excise law are bound by provision of limitation prescribed in terms of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act - AT
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4881 
