Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Royalty payment to a related person - it is wrong to conclude that that Tarun Mohan being a Director of the respondent was not entitled to enter into an agreement for the transfer of his assets to the company - This ignores the fundamental concept that the assessee being a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 is a separate legal juristic entity - HC
Royalty payment to a related person - it is wrong to conclude that that Tarun Mohan being a Director of the respondent was not entitled to enter into an agreement for the transfer of his assets to the company - This ignores the fundamental concept that the assessee being a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 is a separate legal juristic entity - HC
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
